In this assignment I intend to outline the development of Personnel Management (PM) and Human resource management (HRM). Briefly describing their development and the role they play in a work place today. I will then discuss the role HRM played in changing the approaches adopted by management to employment, before finally hypothesising about the future direction of HRM.
PM can be traced all the way back to the late 18th century and the industrial revolution in England. However for the purpose of this assignment my analysis will begin much later after the Second World War (WW2). WW2 created a massive demand for labour and in particular personal specialists. It was in late 1946 that these specialists created the Institute of Personnel
…show more content…
These changes took place for a number of reasons. The economy in general was changing and there was a shift from manufacturing to service and the focus moved to customers both internally and externally. Huge technological strides were made during this period which allowed business to change with it. There was also a change in attitude towards employees so, family friendly policies were introduced and employers tried to help employees achieve a work life balance.
HRM started to become an integral part of business, where PM had been reactive HRM became proactive and was involved in decision making. They are also involved with management up to board level and contribute to the bottom line of the business (profit). HRM is now responsible for the hard S’s: strategic planning, structure, systems and service internal/external. HRM still includes the soft S’s and these are now much less involved because HRM is about planning ahead and making provisions for retirements, temporary cover for busy periods and other foreseeable and unforeseeable problems ahead. HRM staff now work closely with unions, with a close relationship both parties are now far better at avoiding union action and problems can generally be sorted quickly with little fuss.
There is still a great debate between academics as to whether HRM is a whole new concept or just a repackaging of PM. Some experts, for example Legge 1995 and Storey 1989; 1995 suggest that the message itself is not the
These changes drastically altered the way in which production occurred because they allowed for many unskilled workers to be able to contribute to the production of certain products and the speed of production for said products increased astronomically.
1. Ch 1, page 60-61, question 4: What is “evidence based HR”? Why might an HR department resist becoming evidenced based?
2. Give some examples of ethical issues that you have experienced in jobs, and explain how HR did or did not help resolve them.
particularly in the UK, who viewed the emergence of HRM in general and of a normative high
Consequently, ten years earlier, HRM is more likely to be a department for people who got demotion to go. Business people’s understanding of HRM was not comprehensive enough. Therefore its theory and practice were not operated in a right way. It is fortunate today that this science has got more and more attention. People begin to realise its impact on the financial performance. It is a totally new area of management practice. Time for HRM dynasty has come.
It is more people orientated and a knowledge based service underpinned by well-established policies and procedures responsible for empowering the workforce to be able to provide services. As a result you will find that HR within the public sector especial that of local authorities is larger and multilayered with a division of specialist disciplines such are recruitment, training and development and employee relations. The negative impact of HRM within the public sector can be observed by the policies and procedures that are driving it. HRM becomes a discipline of policing and reinforcing the adhering of policies and procedures. Unlike the private sector this style of HRM draws away from managerial integration to a separate secular entity.
People are biggest asset for every organization and, therefore, to draw, motivate, and preserve the most skilled employees and assign them to jobs for which they are exceptionally well suited is a responsible job for human resource. Therefore, human resources management is done in all type of organizations. Profound management of people is equally indispensable in success of organizations as the sound management of production, finance, and other operations. The human resource management field postulates the infinite diversity of people and their dynamics (McKenzie & Traynor, 2002). To get into this career field, one must have the required education degree by completing many different courses, and have the experience along with skills and
Throughout eighteenth and nineteenth century Britain, there was a major shift caused by social, economic and political changes, now commonly known as the Industrial Revolution. Historians, though, are still haunted by whether this was a revolution or an evolution due to the varying rate of each individual change. Britain’s population boom, rapid technological advancements, and the mass migration of workers from the countryside to cities contributing to mass-production of goods in factories and strong economic growth in areas such as the textile industry, mark this period as predominantly a revolution, however, it was also partially an evolution as poor working conditions were gradually addressed over a much longer time span.
Beautyism in the workplace is discrimination in one of its most disguised forms. Employers get away with this form of discrimination everyday. Because someone is categorized as beautiful it doesn’t mean that they have all the knowledge they need to succeed on a job or neither does it validate that they are a better selection than the next person. An idea can be developed or an assumption made from the treatment that is given to the person who was hired because of beautyism. What will be noticed in most cases it the special treatment that is given that is
Human Resource Management involves a wide array of functions that encompasses the time from when an employee enters an organization to the time the employee leaves the organization. The specific activities that are involved in HRM include job design and analysis, recruitment, orientation and placement, development and training of the personnel, employee remuneration, and performance appraisal (Aswathappa, 2007: 5). This paper shall focus on three main activities which are recruitment, training, and personnel development. When it comes to recruitment, it is incumbent upon the Human Resource Manager to bring into the workforce, employees that are both wiling and competent to accomplish specific tasks. The work of recruitment goes hand in
Previously HRM dealt with basic things like hiring and recruitment, training and development, compensation and benefits and performance
Due to the ever-changing job market, the Public Sector utilizes Human Resource Management by furthering specialized categories of services. Position Management plays a key role in organizations job duties and classifications used especially in the merit system by job type and level of responsibilities which leads to limiting payroll salaries only needed for that position. As organizations change internally the Position Management will analyze the current employees and their performances based on performance appraisal and the diversity within the workplace. The Position management will also evaluate the compensation packages to ensure that they are within the current market in ensuring to attract qualified professional talent when a position comes available. The Position Manager is also used to ensure that all salaries are within the allocated budget for the organizations. They used to cut the cost of an organization to run lean and efficiently with fewer employees.
Since the 1980s, human resource management (HRM) has become the most widely recognized term in the Anglophone world referring to the activities of management in organizing work and managing people to achieve organizational
It was inconceivable that traditional personnel management techniques were in great pressure to adapt in order to maintain effectiveness within a diverse and ever-changing business environment. The role of the conventional personnel manager now had to adopt an increasingly varied and multifaceted approach in the form of HRM. The main objectives of HRM are to support an organisation, to ultimately "manage the managers" (Carney. A, 2007).
Human resource management (HRM) can be described as a process of managing people in a company with a structured and thorough manner (MSG.com). 'This covers the fields of staffing (hiring people), retention of people; pay and perks setting and management, performance management, change management and taking care of exits from the company to round off the activities ' (MSG). These functions relate to what used to be called personnel management, which theorists see HRM as the modern version of personnel management. As Aswathappa (2005) explains HRM can be challenging and stressful, also describing the function as being no comfier than when personnel management was in place. All these elements of HRM mentioned previously are jobs that Christine Williamson is responsible for managing in the human resource (HR) department. Mitchell (no date) states that Williamson believes the department still performs in a primarily personnel function with a limited strategic perspective. Armstrong (2006) explains personnel management includes being concerned with obtaining, organising and motivating the human resources that are used in the enterprise. These elements are a reflection of the jobs Williamson undertakes.