Unit CU3957: Principles of Management and Leadership Assignment
Within this assignment I will describe my understanding of the links between management and leadership, the skills and styles of management and leadership, the application of management and leadership theories in an organisational context and planning for the development of management and leadership skills.
1. Management and Leadership Links
To fully explain the relationship between Leadership and Management we need to appreciate that the two go hand in hand, they are by no means the same thing but they complement each other when driving any team to perform and exceed targets within a business. The manager’s job is very task-focused. They often have to follow company
…show more content…
2. Skills and Styles of Management and Leadership
For this section I am going to compare the skills and styles of 2 very different leaders; Richard Branson founder of the Virgin Group and Steve Jobs founder of Apple Inc.
Richard is not afraid to take risks and believes that his people are the foundation to his company’s success. `My philosophy is, put your employees first, your customers second and your investors third and in the end everyone will be happy’ (Inc, 2013). From researching his leadership style I would say that Richard is a transformational democratic leader, he likes to get other peoples input and develop on their ideas. Richard believes that praise goes much further than criticism in achieving results so he likes to lead his team using positive reinforcement. Richard seems to be a very caring and involved leader who listens to everyone and is very professional in his leadership style, he is definitively a relationship-oriented leader who is good at aligning people and giving them emotional support and encouragement. He seems to fall into the segment of being a participative and consultative leader whilst his strong charisma seems to make anyone listen and follow him.
Steve Jobs on the other hand has a very innovative leadership style; he was a perfectionist who had the courage to change his mind. Steve was a very unconventional leader, he was very `high-maintenance’ who demanded excellence from his staff and was known for his
Leadership vs. Management, are they the same? No!. “A leader focus on setting goals and direction, challenging the norm, and seeking new ways of working towards the goals. On the other side, Managers specialize on conformance to the standards. They manage teams and individuals, organizing, directing and controlling to achieve goals” (EBA, 2016).
In this ever growing, rapid developing world as we can see today, there are many different successful leaders. As we know it, leaders are humans just like everyone else. How did they manage to stand out from the crowd? What did they do to achieve great success for an organization? As of all the successful leaders in the world, Steve Jobs is one of the successful leaders that managed to achieve great success for an organization. Therefore, Steve Jobs is the leader that I personally admire and would like to emulate.
Steve Jobs used inspirational motivation to inspire people to think big and diversity to build the right mix of talent to make his companies successful. Visionary leaders have a talent for leading their teams towards a common goal. They create a positive image of their future and inspire their followers with their vision. Steve had a true talent to
There are a number of traits that leaders need to have in managing their employees for purpose of effectiveness in a given organization. In trying to manage the activities of the organizations, there always arises a difference in the leadership styles that are portrayed by these particular leaders based on the organizations and the people that they lead. One of the leaders in the world who has demonstrated one of the best leadership qualities in the business world is Sir Richard Branson. Sir Richard Branson is the founder and the Chief Executive Officer of the Virgin Atlantic group and he happens to be one of the leaders who have made tremendous progress in the industry by leading his group to great successes. Sir Branson has always taken an active role in the process of selecting employees by selecting some of the best-qualified candidates for different categories.
Based on Maxwell, leadership is a verb not a noun and it's a process not a destination or finish line. There are 5 levels, level 1: position, level 2: permission, level 3: production, level 4: people development, level 5: pinnacle, as the higher level is, the better a leader is. As who he is right now, Sir Richard Branson has reached the level 5, which is pinnacle. Pinnacle simply means that a leader that has a reputation for excellence because people follow him not because of his position but because who he is and what value that he represents, some people said that only natural gifted leaders reach the pinnacle. Pinnacle leaders have created a legacy that transcends their organization and extends beyond their industry. As a leader that holding the employee value, Sir Richard Branson has made his employees follow him not because of his position as the Virgin Group founder and CEO, but he can make his employees reach their highest potential and he develop them because he appreacites his every single employees, his employees do respect him as their leader. The qualities of leadership as well as entrepreneurship have been explored in terms of definitions, articles, sources and expert understanding of what these qualities mean and are. However, in this instance there is one other variable, which helps to explain how Sir
This reports provides information on who is Richard Branson, what type of leadership style he uses in his organisation. This will require me to read journals, case studies to be able to retain information about Richard Branson. These sources will aid me to find out about his leadership style and I will be using theories to support my work, to analyze critically on his style of managing a successful company like Virgin.
During his time as CEO of Apple, Steve Jobs displayed the attributes outlined in many leadership theories. In some ways he was charismatic, powerful,
Richard Branson’s Rule Breaker leadership style has been known to be extremely effective which is evident from the success he has endured in his life. Each moment of his life has contributed to his unique and efficient leadership style. Even after being successful, he has continued to invest in small businesses that helped people grow unremittingly. He believes in young entrepreneurs and strives to help them with achieving their goals. There are various key
Steve Jobs was broadly known for being the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Apple Company, and was frequently thought to be a virtuoso and a genuine pioneer. It is the general thought that he was a phenomenal individual who was monstrously appreciated by devotees of Apple items and numerous other individuals, whose lives were by one means or another impacted by his items. In addition, Steve Jobs had mystique that affected his initiative style and brought about his conspicuous achievement. In this way, Steve Jobs was accepted to have an appealing administration style, as indicated by Weber's meaning of alluring initiative, in which he expresses that a magnetic pioneer more often than not displays a particular conduct in having a dream, being charming, mentally invigorating individuals who tail him, and moving and propelling individuals to go past the breaking points of desires. Furthermore, magnetic pioneers continually search for change and change, hence, making advancement, and affecting advancement. All the previously mentioned qualities identify with Steve Jobs' identity and initiative style. In this way, one can consider Steve Jobs a genuine magnetic pioneer and a standout amongst the most persuasive pioneers of the 21st century. Steve Jobs has dependably been viewed as an irregularity in administration; his initiative style was a comment or to reprimand, yet unquestionably not to reproduce. He didn't fit into the systems of business reading material: there was
Branson believes he learned leadership through trial and error, since founding his first company, Student Magazine, at the age of 16. Branson believes his key elements of leadership style is caring about people and being a good leader, “you must like people who you can bring out the best in them” As a leader another key aspect is being able to develop teamwork, commitment, and employee motivation. A team and consensus builder is able by involving, empowering and creating a positive work environment for employees (HiTec Holdings, 2006). Branson appears to love what he does, and his goal is to tackle ideas and take risks.
In this ever growing, rapid developing world as we can see today, there are many different successful leaders. As we know it, leaders are humans just like everyone else. How did they manage to stand out from the crowd? What did they do to achieve great success for an organization? As of all the successful leaders in the world, Steve Jobs is one of the successful leaders that managed to achieve great success for an organization. Therefore, Steve Jobs is the leader that I personally admire and would like to emulate.
The meaning of management is 'the process of dealing with or controlling things or people’ (Oxford dictionary, no date). Henri Fayol suggested managers need to complete the following six points as a basic manager overview; predict and plan their business ' future, utilize resources to achieve set objectives, command a team to complete task 's, communicate between departments for task completion matching the business plan as stated by The importance of good management - recruiting, selecting and training entrepreneurial managers – Arcadia (1995). These coincide with the four more abbreviated roles of a manger as suggested by Schermerhorn (2011) which are plan, organise, lead and control with each manager having a varied style to complete these tasks. Management can come in many forms and styles. In order to be a successful manager you must know which style of management and approach to undertake to gain the most from the team/ organisation (Understanding management and leadership styles, no date). Leadership is a top priority on the agenda of a manager with it being recognized as a primary reason for both the success or failure of an organisation its applied to (Sadler, 2003). There are many types of leadership with each manager picking a style appropriate to the environment they are leading. Leadership is the ability to provide direction and influence people to achieve an organisation/ personal goals (Murari, 2015). The aim of this report will be to explore
This paragraph will critically analyze the leadership style of Steve Jobs the CEO of Apple inc, as well as his dominant leadership behavior. Kramer(2010), highlights that Steve jobs is generally acknowledged as a ‘strong charismatic leader’ in the innovation and entertainment industry. Charisma, a blessing given to few individuals, nature presented that on Steve Jobs, alongside a spellbinding capacity to charm a group. He is famous internationally for his capacity to give speeches and charm the gathering of people ' attention. He can captivate his workers and group of spectators with the capacity of an evangelist. Stanford (2005) argues that Steve Jobs was an unconventional leader and his administration style was mind boggling. He was an imperious and directive leader driven by convictions and a dream of making a persevering
In July of 2000, General Mills acquired Pillsbury from London based Diageo for $10.5 billion in stock and assumed debt. (All Business, A D&B Company) After the merger, managers from General Mills were now faced with integrating the two Minnesota based companies. A special concern that had been brought up was marketing issues. With such household names such as Pillsbury, Betty Croker, Green Giant, Wheaties, and Cheerios, the managers at General Mills had a large task at hand on how to continue to market the many brands under their umbrella. As said by Kevin Wilde, the company’s chief learning officer, they had wanted to
Jobs used to tell his employees that we do not need to ask what consumers’ want; we will observe and show them what they need. As a result, he became an innovator businessman. Another difference is in their leadership style. Gates was a charismatic manager that believed in trust between colleagues and clever agreements. On the other hand, Jobs was a rare, unique leader with a distinctive personality. He was a criticizer, a perfectionist with an aggressive, demanding managing style. According to Isaacson (2012), Jobs belongs on the list of America’s great modern leaders. Another difference is the level of challenges each hero faced before success. While Bill Gates was a University dropout and a former owner of a failed business, Steve Jobs went through many more hardships. He was