Henry Craik, ed. English Prose. 1916.
Vol. I. Fourteenth to Sixteenth Century
Henry Hart Milman (17911868)
[Henry Hart Milman, son of Sir Francis Milman, physician to George III., was born in London, 1791. He was educated at Eton and Brasenose College, Oxford, won the Newdigate in 1812 with a poem on The Apollo Belvedere, and became a Fellow of his college. He was afterwards Professor of Poetry in the University (1827) and Bampton Lecturer. Milman had taken orders in 1816, and after various preferments was appointed to the Deanery of St. Paul’s in 1849. Besides poems and dramas written in the earlier part of his life—Fazio, a Tragedy; Samor, Lord of the Bright City (an Epic); The Fall of Jerusalem; The Martyr of Antioch; Belshazzar; Anne Boleyn—Milman made translations from Æschylus and Euripides, and from the Sanskrit. Several of his sacred lyrics have taken their place in the English hymnology. His prose works were—The History of the Jews (1829), History of Christianity to the abolition of Paganism in the Roman Empire (1840), and The History of Latin Christianity to the Pontificate of Nicholas V. (1854–56). In 1868 was published posthumously The Annals of St. Paul’s Cathedral (1868), and a volume—Savonarola, Erasmus, and other Essays (1870). Milman died in 1868, and was buried in his Cathedral.]
Milman has, however, claims to be remembered other than that he was a pioneer of a long-ago victorious critical movement. Without question one of the most accomplished men of letters of the present century, a distinguished editor and translator from the classics and from the Sanskrit, a poet of considerable imaginative range and lyrical sweetness, a far-sighted critic, an historian of ample learning and power, he seems to have his place on that border line where rare and brilliant talent melts into genius. Test him by some searching touchstone of genius, and he may indeed fall short; measure him by any rule of talent, and he satisfies but transcends it with much to spare.
The History of Latin Christianity is a work of epic proportions, and, save in its style, approaches epic dignity. A subject hardly less majestic than that of Gibbon, it was less susceptible of historic treatment in the grand style because it lacked an inherent unity. Without Gibbon’s marked distinction of manner, Milman possesses many of the virtues of a good writer, and sustains with fluent ease the weight of his great narrative. A notable man, one may say of him, in the best company, the company in which the highest names are those of Hooker, of Taylor, and of Berkeley; at his best comparable, if not superior, to any English historian after Gibbon, and one who in every page of his writing stands revealed as above all else a Christian, a scholar, and a gentleman.