Noe Drilling Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the MIRR. If the decision s made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher MIRR, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the NPV of the chosen project versus the maximum possible NPV? Note that (1) "true value" is measured by NPV, and (2) under some conditions the choice of IRR vs. MIRR will have no effect on the value ost.

Noe Drilling Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the MIRR. If the decision s made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher MIRR, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the NPV of the chosen project versus the maximum possible NPV? Note that (1) "true value" is measured by NPV, and (2) under some conditions the choice of IRR vs. MIRR will have no effect on the value ost.

Name: Noe Drilling Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows a
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T06:50:59.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: Noe Drilling Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below.These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believesthe IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the MIRR.

Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course List)

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337395083

Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves

Publisher:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves

Chapter12: Capital Budgeting: Decision Criteria

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 11P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Dupont Chemicals is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much, if any, the value will be forgone, L.e, what's the chosen NPV versus the maximum possible NPVn Note that (1) "true value" is measured by NPV, and (2) under some conditions the choice of IRR vs. NPV will have no effect on the value gained or lost. WACC: 7,50% Year 4 CFS -$1,500 $550 $600 $100 $200 CFL $3,000 $650 $725 $800 $1.600
Tesar Chemicals is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the chosen NPV versus the maximum possible NPV? Note that (1) "true value" is measured by NPV, and (2) under some conditions the choice of IRR vs. NPV will have no effect on the value gained or lost. WACC: 8% Year CFS CFL O $33.32 O $29.07 O $26.95 O $23.51 O $21.19 0 -$1,500 -$2,200 1 $300 $400 2 $400 $700 3 $700 $900 4 $800 $1,100
ND Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates other methods. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the Profitability index? Discuss your results of these methods and make a recommendation on the projects to the CEO about which one to go for and why?
Tesar Chemicals is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutuallyexclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFOadvocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with thehigher NPV, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the chosen NPV versus the maximum possible NPV?Note that (1) "true value" is measured by NPV, and (2) under some conditions the choice of IRR vs. NPV will have noeffect on the value gained or lost.WACC: 7.50%Year 0 1 2 3 4CFS −$1,100 $550 $600 $100 $100CFL−$2,700 $650 $725 $800 $1,400
ND Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates other methods. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the NPV and IRR of the chosen project(s). What is the Payback period and discounted payback period?
Current Design Co. is considering two mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable projects, S and L. Their cash flows are shown below. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the chosen NPV versus the maximum possible NPV? Note that (1) "true value" is measured by NPV, and (2) under some conditions the choice of IRR vs. NPV will have no effect on the value gained or lost. r: 8% Year CFS CFL $149.21 $130.31 $121.42 $101.96 $98.10 0 -$1,200 -$2,800 $700 $600 2 $600 $735 3 $150 $700 4 $110 $1,800
Cosmos Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, so no value will be lost if the IRR method is used. WACC: 12.50% Year CFS CFL O $36.77 $61.03 O $48.85 O $24.80 0 1 2 3 4 $770 $780 -$2,050 $750 $760 -$4,300 $1,500 $1,518 $1,536 $1,554
Dupont Chemicals is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive equally sky and not repeatable The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the highor RR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much, if any, the value will be forgone, Le, what's the chosen NPV versus the maximum possible NPV? Note that (1) "bue value is med by NPV and (2) under some conditions the choice of IRR vs. NPV will have no effect on the value gained or lost WACC 7.50% Year CFS CFL 1 4 0 $1,500 $550 2 3 $600 $100 $200 $3,000 $650 $725 $800 $1,600
Sexton Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, so no value will be lost if the IRR method is used. WACC: 12.75% 0 1 2 3 4 CFs -$2050 $750 $760 $770 $780 CF L -$4300 $1500 $1518 $1536 $1554 Options: $24.80 $30.25 $22.32 $28.52 $22.57
Markman & Sons is considering Projects S and L. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable and their cash flows are shown below. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the project with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, i.e., no conflict will exist. r: 10.00% Year 0 1 2 3 4 CFs -$1,025 $650 $450 $250 $50 CFL -$1,025 $100 $300 $500 $700 a. $6.62 b. $7.82 c. $7.29 O d. $6.02 ○ e. $5.47
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, i.e., no conflict will exist. WACC: CFS CFL O a. $59.20 O b. $62.75 O c. $51.51 O d. $65.71 O e. $53.28 6.75% 0 -$1,025 -$1,025 1 $650 $100 2 $450 $300 3 $250 $500 4 $50 $700
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, i.e., no conflict will exist. WACC: CFS CFL $72.36 $86.14 $70.64 $107.68 $99.07 5.25% 0. -$1,025 -$1,025 1 $650 $100 - 2 $450 $300 3 $250 $500 $50 $700